In civil society work, the concept of “youth empowerment” is often addressed as part of a social responsibility project or as a gesture of goodwill. However, when we consider the complexity of today’s global challenges, it becomes clear that this issue is not merely a preference, but a structural necessity for the sustainability of the civic space. This text approaches youth empowerment not from an emotional standpoint, but through the lenses of social benefit and institutional efficiency, with a neutral and analytical perspective.

Civil society, by its very nature, functions as a mechanism for addressing social problems. Yet the definition of these problems and the methods used to solve them evolve over time. Approaches that were effective twenty years ago may no longer be sufficient to respond to today’s challenges. At this point, empowering young people essentially means strengthening civil society’s own capacity for adaptation. Including young people in decision-making processes is not about offering them a symbolic seat at the table; it is about injecting institutions with new perspectives, renewed energy, and up-to-date technological competence.

Here, it is crucial to define the concept of “empowerment” accurately. Empowerment does not mean delegating already existing tasks to young people. Genuine empowerment lies in creating safe spaces where young individuals can explore their potential and take initiative without fear of making mistakes. In this process, the ideal scenario is not a clash between the experience of older generations and the dynamism of youth, but rather their complementarity. This is what we refer to as intergenerational synergy.

While one side represents institutional memory and strategic depth, the other embodies innovation and speed. A successful civil society model is one that can bring these two dimensions together in a balanced and constructive way.

Especially in areas such as the climate crisis, digital rights, and global migration, it is essential for young people to be positioned not only as “implementers” but also as “policy makers.” These issues directly shape their future. Therefore, youth empowerment is also a matter of justice. Recognizing young people not merely as “the leaders of tomorrow” but as “stakeholders of today” enhances the legitimacy of the decisions being made.

Entrusting responsibility to a young person sends a clear message: “Your ideas matter, and your voice should be part of this institution’s future.” This message strengthens the sense of belonging and revitalizes young people’s trust in civil society.

However, this process is not one-sided. Young people also need to learn the ethical values, patience, and culture of dialogue that define civil society from more experienced generations. Empowerment is a reciprocal learning process. Neither the energy of youth nor the wisdom of experience is sufficient on its own. Real strength emerges from the balanced coexistence of both.

In conclusion, empowering young people within civil society is a strategic step that institutions must take to remain viable in the future. Structures that open their doors to young ideas, new methods, and critical perspectives will continue to lead social transformation. The goal should be to build a more inclusive and resilient civil society—one in which the voices of young people resonate, and experience serves as a guiding force.

Ayça Simay Dinçer
Yücel Cultural Foundation
Volunteer Writer